MJ Law GroupYour Mission. Our Fight.

Practice Area

Boards for Correction of Military Records

The Secretary's own board, and often the last shot to fix the record.

Overview

About BCMR / BCNR

The Boards for Correction of Military Records are the highest administrative remedy within a military department: the Secretary's own board, empowered under 10 U.S.C. § 1552 to correct any error or remove any injustice in a service member's record. There is one per department: the ABCMR (Army), the BCNR (Navy and Marine Corps), the AFBCMR (Air Force and Space Force), and the Coast Guard BCMR. Their jurisdiction is remarkably broad, covering discharge upgrades (including the court-martial discharges the DRBs cannot reach), adverse evaluation reports, removal of GOMORs and Letters of Reprimand, corrections of rank and date of rank, retirement-point audits for Reserve and Guard service, promotion restorations, medical retirement corrections, reenlistment code changes, and Survivor Benefit Plan election corrections. Petitions are filed on a DD Form 149 (or DHS Form 4640 for the Coast Guard) within three years of discovering the error, though that time bar is routinely waived in the interest of justice. The proceeding is almost entirely a paper record; the brief is the case. Advisory opinions from the service are common, the petitioner carries the burden of overcoming a presumption that official records are correct, and if the board denies relief, the next stop is federal court under the Administrative Procedure Act, where a highly deferential standard of review makes the BCMR the last real opportunity to fix the record.

BCMR petitions are built the way federal court briefs are built: investigating the underlying facts, developing a full documentary record, and drafting a legal brief that anticipates and closes off likely service objections. When the service issues an adverse advisory opinion, we rebut it. When the board denies relief, we handle reconsideration and, where warranted, federal court review under the APA.

What’s at Stake

Your last administrative chance before federal court litigation.

  • Removal of a GOMOR, reprimand, or adverse evaluation from your record
  • Discharge upgrades the Discharge Review Boards cannot reach
  • Correction of rank, date of rank, and promotion eligibility
  • Retirement point audits for Reserve and National Guard service
  • Medical retirement corrections and disability rating adjustments
  • Back pay and allowances flowing from the correction

Common Questions

Frequently Asked

What is the difference between a BCMR and a Discharge Review Board?
The Discharge Review Board does one thing: review the characterization of a discharge, within 15 years of separation, and it cannot touch a discharge imposed by a general court-martial. A Board for Correction of Military Records is the Secretary's own board, empowered by statute to correct any error or remove any injustice in a military record. Its jurisdiction is far broader. It can reach court-martial discharges, remove reprimands and adverse evaluations, correct rank and date of rank, audit retirement points, adjust medical retirement determinations, change reenlistment codes, and order back pay that follows from the correction. As a practical matter, veterans often go to the DRB first when the discharge characterization is the only issue and they are within the window, and to the BCMR when they are not, or when the problem is something other than characterization.
How long do I have to file a BCMR petition?
The statute sets a three-year deadline running from the date you discovered, or reasonably should have discovered, the error. In practice that deadline is routinely waived in the interest of justice, and boards regularly consider petitions filed decades after the underlying events. Waiver is not automatic, however. A petition filed well outside the window should address the delay directly and explain why the interest of justice supports review, whether because the error was not discoverable earlier, because governing policy has changed, or because the injustice is serious enough that the passage of time should not bar relief. Do not treat the three-year mark as a closed door, but do not ignore it either.
What are my chances at a Board for Correction?
Relief rates are lower than most petitioners expect, and understanding why is the key to filing a strong petition. The proceeding is almost entirely a paper record, with no hearing in the ordinary case, and the petitioner carries the burden of overcoming a legal presumption that official military records are correct. The service also submits advisory opinions that frequently oppose relief and that many petitioners never rebut. What separates successful petitions is almost always the quality of the submission: a fully developed documentary record, a legal brief that identifies the specific error or injustice with precision, and a rebuttal to the advisory opinion when one issues. This matters more than at most stages of a military legal matter, because if the board denies relief, review in federal court under the Administrative Procedure Act is highly deferential. The BCMR is realistically the last opportunity to fix the record.
CallConsultation